I…
No.
That’s not the point.
Nor is the point accurate.
The beaver was declared a “fish” because the poor were able to catch it and eat it. It was in line with Lenten observances of conforming one’s mind and lifestyle to the poor.
(Source: neotheist)
-
douglas-leech reblogged this from neotheist
-
lesleepetersen reblogged this from cephalopodsmile
-
chococrunch reblogged this from neotheist
-
jarebear9241 liked this
-
lisavilisa liked this
-
awakened-being liked this
-
shinkei-shinto liked this
-
steveninhisyouth reblogged this from neotheist
-
browneyednerd reblogged this from scarletsyd
-
thinkingreality reblogged this from neotheist and added:
I cannot agree more.
-
pandas4256 liked this
-
theimmortalspirit liked this
-
beckischneiderr reblogged this from neotheist
-
eximago reblogged this from neotheist
-
waitressstories liked this
-
big-green-style liked this
-
weakfl3sh reblogged this from you-me-rainbows
-
shaving23spiders liked this
-
you-me-rainbows reblogged this from scarletsyd
-
scarletsyd reblogged this from wheresmywaterbuffalo and added:
16th century decision by the then Pope to declare the semi-aquatic capybara as fish for Catholics to eat during lent. so...
-
dirtyhands-cleansouls liked this
-
wheresmywaterbuffalo reblogged this from cephalopodsmile
-
but-what-if-i-want-wings liked this
-
fuckterclust reblogged this from neotheist
-
martiisfly reblogged this from cephalopodsmile
-
missgingerlee liked this
-
racionalsinistro liked this
-
osastar liked this
-
bekkaa liked this
-
hummingbirdprince reblogged this from agentsama
-
agentsama reblogged this from neotheist and added:
I… No. That’s not the point. Nor is the point accurate. The beaver was declared a “fish” because the poor were able to...
-
cephalopodsmile reblogged this from neotheist
-
dittany liked this
-
vitruvian-venus liked this
-
secularphilosophy liked this
-
westonduchiha liked this
-
neotheist posted this
